The XRP Ledger (XRPL) drew more new tokenized real-world asset capital than Ethereum, Solana, and other major blockchains over the past three months, giving XRP bulls a fresh network-growth argument as traders rebuild exposure to the token.

XRPL recorded $1.9 billion in net real-world asset inflows over the last 90 days, ahead of Ethereum’s $1.6 billion and Stellar’s $1.4 billion, according to RWA Foundation data. BNB Chain followed with $848 million, Solana with $611 million, Avalanche with $362 million, Sei Network with $202 million, and Mantle with $90 million.

The data does not mean XRPL has displaced Ethereum as the main venue for tokenized assets. Ethereum still holds more than half of the tokenized real-world asset value tracked by RWA.xyz.

However, the 90-day flow ranking shows new capital moving more aggressively toward XRPL at a time when XRP’s derivatives and exchange-flow data are also improving.

New RWA money tests Ethereum’s lead

The acceleration of capital moving onto the XRP Ledger underscores a shifting competitive dynamic among Layer 1 networks competing for institutional issuance.

Tokenized real-world assets (RWAs), which range from digitized sovereign debt and private credit to multi-asset funds, have expanded significantly.

Data from platform RWA.xyz indicates the global market has reached $33.5 billion in distributed asset value, alongside $350 billion in broader represented asset value.

While Ethereum remains the primary venue for tokenized assets, holding a 52.8% market share with approximately $17 billion in tokenized asset value, its rate of expansion has met stiffer competition from alternative chains.

Ethereum’s asset base grew by roughly 35% over the course of 2026, a substantial rise from its baseline but a clip that is currently being outpaced by XRPL on a relative basis over the short term.

According to a recent analysis from institutional treasury firm Evernorth, XRPL’s growth trajectory sits in the top tier of established legacy networks.

Analysts at the firm noted that the deployment of institutional capital onto the XRPL is distinct due to its structural composition, especially when evaluated against peer infrastructures like Stellar, Avalanche, and Solana.

Evernoth pointed out that the XRPL network’s inflows are primarily defined by episodic, treasury-scale commitments rather than fragmented retail transactions.

This pattern aligns with institutional deployment behavior, where large-scale financial entities execute major programmatic bond and fund originations in single tranches rather than gradual market accumulation.

XRPL’s RWA footprint

The measurement of network activity inside the real-world asset segment requires strict technical distinctions to avoid mischaracterizing on-chain liquidity.

On the XRPL, data from RWA.xyz splits the network’s footprint into two specific accounting layers: distributed asset value and represented asset value.

Currently, the total tokenized assets represented on XRPL stand at approximately $3.6 billion. This layer captures financial assets that utilize the ledger for tracking, compliance, or structural representation.

In contrast, the network’s active distributed asset value, representing assets natively settled and circulating within decentralized protocols, sits at $360.25 million.

This multi-layer architecture is being utilized by commercial banking institutions and asset managers to test the structural efficiency of tokenized fixed-income securities and fund products. The operational plumbing relies heavily on underlying stablecoin liquidity to settle these transactional flows efficiently.

On-chain metrics reflect an expansion of this specific settlement infrastructure. The stablecoin market capitalization on the XRPL reached $907.63 million, marking a 73.44% increase over a rolling 30-day period.

Correspondingly, active transactional velocity has expanded, with 30-day stablecoin transfer volumes rising 90.90% to settle at $4.86 billion.

Ripple has continued adjusting its infrastructure footprint to absorb this institutional activity, advancing payment rails via corporate integrations and ramping up operational settlement mechanics linked to its RLUSD stablecoin.

Upbit becomes the center of XRP trading

The fundamental momentum across the XRPL coincides with a pronounced, though fragmented, return of liquidity to the underlying XRP cryptocurrency.

Data from CryptoSlate shows that the token increased by more than 5% over the past 24-hours, testing intraday highs of $1.29 before moderating to trade around $1.24.

The price increase occurred against a broader ascending crypto market that has been fuelled by the peace deal between the US and Iran.

However, granular wallet analysis reveals that the capital flows underpinning this market structure are unevenly distributed across international trading hubs.

According to blockchain data published by CryptoQuant, wallet-flow dominance has experienced a sharp geographic rotation rather than uniform global buying pressure.

Data tracking net wallet flows shows that deposit and withdrawal activity has concentrated heavily inside South Korea via Upbit, the nation’s largest digital asset exchange. Upbit’s share of global XRP wallet-flow dominance climbed from 13% on June 7 to 31% by June 14, representing its highest concentration of network interaction since May 2024.

This localized acceleration stands in stark contrast to Western platforms, which have experienced a simultaneous decline in dominance.

Coinbase’s wallet-flow dominance fell from 27% on May 7 to 0% by June 14, indicating a near-total normalization or cessation of net deposit activity relative to global volumes. Over the identical timeframe, Binance’s dominance slid from 16% to 13%, and Crypto.com observed a contraction from 9% to 3%.

This internal divergence shows that the ongoing market participation is structurally divided, driven primarily by intensive capital rotation within East Asian trading venues rather than a broader retail resurgence across US or European platforms.

Derivatives markets rebound without excess leverage

The spot market shifts are mirrored within the cryptocurrency derivatives complex, where open interest metrics indicate a disciplined rebuilding of risk positions.

On Binance, which serves as the primary clearing venue for digital asset futures, the 30-day rolling average for XRP open interest climbed to its highest level in more than four months.

CryptoQuant stated that the total open interest within the contract reached approximately 486.8 million XRP, with the 30-day moving average stabilizing at 484.8 million XRP.

The steady upward arc follows an extended multi-month correction that purged built-up leverage from the system, pointing to a methodical return of positioning rather than speculative spikes.

Further analysis of this positioning suggests the current market structure remains balanced, with the XRP Open Interest Z-Score registered at 0.19.

By remaining firmly within normal historical boundaries, the indicator suggests that the expansion in open interest is the byproduct of a gradual accumulation of directional and hedging positions rather than unhedged leverage.

This measured build-up suggests market participants are positioning for structural volatility rather than immediate speculative liquidations.

Source link

Solana spot ETF AUM crossed $1 billion by month-end, following $115.3 million in net inflows in May, the best monthly figure of 2026.

The market cap of tokenized real-world assets hit $2.8 billion, stablecoin supply crossed $16.4 billion, perps volume reached $64.6 billion, and Solana accounted for 97% of cumulative on-chain tokenized-equity spot trading volume.

That makes the market question simple: why is Solana falling while ETF flows and network usage are moving the other way?

SOL is trading near $63, and the disconnect between network momentum and token price can be explained by the fact that activity does not equal value capture, according to Jake Kennis, senior research analyst at Nansen.

Fees, stablecoin flows, tokenized equity volume, and ETF flows each benefit validators, issuers, platforms, and market makers before reaching SOL holders. In Solana’s current fee structure, the connection between network usage, token burn, and SOL value capture is weaker than the headline activity numbers suggest.

The fee structure behind the gap

Solana’s base fees are split 50% to burn and 50% to block producers. Priority fees, which dominate activity during high-throughput periods, flow 100% to validators after SIMD-0096.

That means a busy day on Solana with high-priority-fee activity and dense block usage routes the bulk of fee revenue to validators, with burn staying flat regardless of throughput.

SIMD-0547, currently under discussion, argues that Solana’s burn rate is around 648 SOL per day, even at sustained high throughput.

On a network processing billions in daily volume, that figure reflects a design flaw in which usage accrues to the network’s operators and application layer before it accrues to SOL as an asset.

Users can settle $16 billion in stablecoins across Solana while holding only the minimum SOL required for transaction fees. Equity trading volume benefits the platforms and brokers facilitating those trades. App revenue accumulates at the protocol and frontend layer.

Kennis noted that the breakdown from the $76-$98 range toward the mid-$60s reflects macro risk-off pressure repricing a high-beta asset, with supply dynamics, holder distribution, and broader liquidity conditions governing SOL’s price in ways positive headlines cannot immediately reach.

The macro layer

Ryan Day, CMO of Solstice, said the SpaceX IPO is pricing this week, targeting a valuation of roughly $1.75 trillion and at least $75 billion in proceeds, with Reuters reporting that retail investors have been allocated up to 30% of the shares.

OpenAI and Anthropic are queued behind it, and when capital of that scale moves to market, risk assets across equities, credit, and crypto reprice to raise cash.

Every high-beta asset is absorbing the same pressure, and SOL’s drawdown is a position in that read, one shared with Bitcoin, which has been trading near $61,500.

Nasdaq’s fast-entry rule could allow eligible newly listed mega-caps to enter the Nasdaq-100 within 15 trading days of listing, drawing passive fund demand into SpaceX after it begins trading. The mechanism extends the time speculative capital stays repositioned away from crypto.

Across a longer horizon, the sustained distance between SOL’s price and Solana’s fundamental momentum points to the value-capture structure.

The bear case with substance

Day identifies the structural criticism of Solana’s tokenomics, which run on an 8% initial inflation rate, a 15% annual disinflation rate, and a 1.5% long-term floor.

At the current pace of disinflation, the path to terminal inflation takes roughly 5.7 years. During that period, SOL supply grows continuously, and without burn, staking demand, or other sinks offsetting issuance at scale, dilution becomes the dominant tokenomic force regardless of ecosystem activity.

Regarding the memecoin reputation due to Pump.fun, Day points out that every major chain chased the same memecoin trading cycle, and singling out Solana for a phenomenon that played out identically on Ethereum, Base, and BNB Chain reflects an insider framing error applied unevenly.

The inflation critique runs on specific numbers, while the memecoin critique is a reputational hangover applied to a trade every major chain ran.

What the community is voting on

The reform proposals already in discussion are a direct response to the value-capture gap the market is pricing in.

SIMD-0550 proposes doubling Solana’s annual disinflation rate from 15% to 30%, thereby compressing the path to a 1.5% terminal inflation rate from roughly 5.7 years to 2.8 years.

At current prices, the proposal’s backers estimate the change would reduce future SOL emissions by approximately $1.5 billion.

Anatoly Yakovenko has publicly backed the direction, and the vote on the strongest bear case in Solana tokenomics is happening in the open.

SIMD-0547 addresses Solana fee burn by adding a resource-based base fee that is fully burned, designed so burn scales directly with network resource consumption as priority fees route to validators.

If adopted, days with genuine network stress would generate burns in the tens of thousands of SOL, closing the gap between network activity and direct token value capture that 648 SOL per day leaves open.

Validator support, community coordination, and activation timelines introduce meaningful uncertainty. Solana’s core community is openly debating both the supply and burn sides of the tokenomics equation, while the market is demanding answers on exactly those points.

If macro liquidity returns as the SpaceX IPO wave clears and SIMD-0550 and SIMD-0547 move toward activation, SOL gains a credible path to re-rating via lower future dilution, higher burn per unit of activity, and an infrastructure already demonstrating ETF demand, institutional settlement rails, and tokenized-equity dominance.

The assets with documented real usage are historically the ones that reprice first when risk appetite recovers.

If reforms stall, inflation stays the dominant tokenomic force, and macro pressure persists, Solana’s contradiction deepens.

The chain accumulates real activity through stablecoin settlement, equity trading, and institutional access, while SOL captures a shrinking share of what that activity is worth.

Proving SOL captures what the network is becoming is what the market is waiting for.

Source link

• SOL price started a downside correction below $66 against the US Dollar.
• The price is now trading below $65 and the 100-hourly simple moving average.
• There was a break below a bullish trend line with support at $66 on the hourly chart of the SOL/USD pair (data source from Kraken).
• The pair could extend losses if it dips below the $63 zone.

Solana Price Dips Again

Solana price failed to stay above $67 and started a downside correction, like Bitcoin and Ethereum. SOL dipped below $66 and $65 to enter a short-term bearish zone.

There was a move below the 50% Fib retracement level of the upward wave from the $60.12 swing low to the $67.90 high. There was a break below a bullish trend line with support at $66 on the hourly chart of the SOL/USD pair.  The price even tested the $63.20 support.

Solana is now trading below $65 and the 100-hourly simple moving average. On the upside, the price is facing resistance near the $65 level. The next major resistance is near the $66 level. The main resistance could be $67.20. A successful close above the $67.20 resistance zone could set the pace for another steady increase. The next key resistance is $68. Any more gains might send the price toward the $70 level.

Downside Break In SOL?

If SOL fails to rise above the $66 resistance, it could start another decline. Initial support on the downside is near the $63.10 zone and the 61.8% Fib retracement level of the upward wave from the $60.12 swing low to the $67.90 high. The first major support is near the $62.20 level.

A break below the $62.20 level might send the price toward the $60 support zone. If there is a close below the $60 support, the price could decline toward the $55 support in the near term.

Technical Indicators

Hourly MACD – The MACD for SOL/USD is gaining pace in the bearish zone.

Hourly Hours RSI (Relative Strength Index) – The RSI for SOL/USD is below the 50 level.

Major Support Levels – $63.10 and $62.50.

Major Resistance Levels – $65.00 and $67.20.

Source link

• SOL price started a fresh decline below $82 and $81.20 against the US Dollar.
• The price is now trading below $81.20 and the 100-hourly simple moving average.
• There is a bearish trend line forming with resistance at $82.00 on the hourly chart of the SOL/USD pair (data source from Kraken).
• The price could start a recovery wave if the bulls defend $78.80 or $78.00.

Solana Price Dips From $84

Solana price failed to remain stable above $83.20 and started a fresh decline, like Bitcoin and Ethereum. SOL declined below the $82 and $81.50 levels.

The bears even pushed the price toward $80. A low was formed at $79.01, and the price is now consolidating losses. There was a break above the 38.2% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the $83.26 swing high to the $79.01 low.

Solana is now trading below $81.20 and the 100-hourly simple moving average. On the upside, immediate resistance is near the $81.10 level or the 50% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the $83.26 swing high to the $79.01 low.

The next major resistance is near the $82.00 level. The main resistance could be $82.80. A successful close above the $82.80 resistance zone could set the pace for another steady increase. The next key resistance is $84.50. Any more gains might send the price toward the $85 level.

More Losses In SOL?

If SOL fails to rise above the $82.00 resistance, it could continue to move down. Initial support on the downside is near the $79 zone. The first major support is near the $78.00 level.

A break below the $78.00 level might send the price toward the $75 support zone. If there is a close below the $75 support, the price could decline toward the $70 support in the near term.

Technical Indicators

Hourly MACD – The MACD for SOL/USD is gaining pace in the bearish zone.

Hourly Hours RSI (Relative Strength Index) – The RSI for SOL/USD is below the 50 level.

Major Support Levels – $79.00 and $78.00.

Major Resistance Levels – $81.20 and $82.00.

Source link